Welwyn Hatfield Council takes homeowner to Supreme Court
A FATHER who used a legal loophole to build a �500,000 family home on the Green Belt, has been hauled before the highest court in the country by Welwyn Hatfield Council.
Alan Beesley had planning permission to build a hay barn at Northaw Brook Meadow, off Coopers Lane Road, near Northaw, but the 40-year-old instead disguised inside a luxury home and lived there with wife Sarah.
The father-of-one then applied for a certificate of lawfulness which is available by homeowners after four years, despite having no planning permission.
Welwyn Hatfield Council has this week taken both Mr Beesley and the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government to the Supreme Court.
James Findlay, representing the council, told the seven law lords: “A person shouldn’t benefit from his own wrong.
You may also want to watch:
“Our case is the activity that underlies this is fraudulent and together constitutes a criminal offence.
“The clear purpose of this planning application was to mislead and to provide a cover story for the activity that then occurred within that building.”
- 1 Dangerous Welwyn Garden City domestic abuser who slashed ex-girlfriend's throat jailed
- 2 Safety check and risk assessment failings for hundreds of Welwyn Hatfield council houses
- 3 When is Team GB cycling star Laura Kenny in action at Tokyo 2020 Olympics?
- 4 The latest court results for Welwyn Hatfield and Potters Bar
- 5 Community reacts to closure of overnight Urgent Care Centre service at New QEII Hospital
- 6 Water safety advice issued following lake drowning
- 7 9 things you didn’t know about the making of Band of Brothers
- 8 New report reveals 28 Covid deaths at Hatfield care home
- 9 Henry Moore Foundation in Hertfordshire appears in new Fake or Fortune? series on BBC One
- 10 The changing nature of Potters Bar high street
The council’s appeal is based upon whether Mr Beesley’s conduct should deprive him of his right to apply for a certificate of lawful use.
James Maurici, representing the Secretary of State, said: “I do not condone or excuse Mr Beesley’s conduct. The law as it currently stands he was entitled to a certificate, it’s our intention to change the law in that regard.”
As the WHT went to press, Mr Beesley’s representative had not opened his arguments to the court.
The case continues.
? The lords hearing the case are: Lords Phillips, Rodgers, Walker, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Lady Hale.