Relief for Potters Bar man over planning victory
A MAN has spoken of his relief after winning a planning battle that threatened his livelihood. Three years ago, Dean Rowe converted his garage into a home office, for use in his IT support business. However, he did not realise he needed planning permissio
A MAN has spoken of his relief after winning a planning battle that threatened his livelihood.
Three years ago, Dean Rowe converted his garage into a home office, for use in his IT support business.
However, he did not realise he needed planning permission to carry out the work and, after a neighbour complained to Hertsmere Borough Council, the battle lines were drawn.
The married father-of-one applied for a change of use certificate but, after this was refused, the council served him with an enforcement notice, ordering him to reinstate the garage.
Amid concerns the loss of his office would make his business unviable, Mr Rowe appealed to the Planning Inspectorate.
And after an anxious wait, planning inspector David Rusdale ruled in his favour, allowing him to keep the office.
Most Read
- 1 Where you can see the Perseid meteor shower in Hertfordshire
- 2 The latest court results for Welwyn Hatfield and Potters Bar
- 3 Warning issued over park fires as hot weather continues
- 4 Family living over their own waste for 13 years due to faulty pipe
- 5 Resident's fury after tree barrier to train line destroyed
- 6 Everything you need to know about the August train driver strike
- 7 Meet your officers at Friday’s Welwyn Garden City event
- 8 Serious shrubland fire extinguished next to M25 on Hertfordshire border
- 9 Family raises funeral funds for mum who was known for helping others
- 10 Screen on the Green returning to Welwyn Garden City
Mr Rowe, of The Spinney, Potters Bar, expressed "relief" at the decision.
"It has been very stressful hanging over our heads for the last two or three years," he said.
The 36-year-old said the fight to keep his office had cost him around �10,000 and admitted the consequences for his business would have been dire if the planning inspector had ruled against him.
"I don't earn a fortune from the business," he said.
"It is a very small business and if I had to get an office outside of home it would have been unviable."
Meanwhile, councillor Hannah David, planning portfolio holder, said: "Our main concern with this
development was the effect the business might have on residential neighbours with regard to disturbance and parking.
"However, we accept the planning inspector's view that an off-street parking space and restrictions on the time deliveries can take place will go some way to lessen the impact on neighbours.
