Man fighting Welwyn Hatfield Council appears at Supreme Court
A MAN fighting to stay living in a �500,000 barn built on the Green Belt appeared at the highest court in the country to face Welwyn Hatfield Council.
Alan Beesley watched from the public gallery of the Supreme Court, as his legal team fought his case.
As reported in last week’s WHT the 40-year-old had applied for a certificate to lawfully stay in his barn, inside of which was a luxury family home, not the hay barn he had planning permission for.
The law states a homeowner can apply to stay in a dwelling if they have lived in it for more than four years.
He admitted deceiving Welwyn Hatfield Council, but his lawyer Alexander Booth asked the seven law lords to “maintain perspective”.
You may also want to watch:
Mr Beesley had previously told the WHT he thought the council had a “bee in their bonnet” about his case and was surprised it had taken the action it had.
The seven law lords adjourned the case and will provide a written judgement in due course.
- 1 Sky Studios Elstree starts recruitment drive ahead of planned 2022 opening
- 2 Rural land near Welwyn to go on sale next month
- 3 9 questions to decide how Welwyn Garden City you are!
- 4 Log thrown through hairdressers' window in Knebworth
- 5 £45m housing development to be showcased as buyers get chance to select home
- 6 Primary school receives award for excellence in science education
- 7 Meet the woman behind Welwyn Garden City’s Halloween postbox topper
- 8 Serial flasher who 'showed no remorse' jailed
- 9 Residents and councillors react to Lloyds Bank closure
- 10 Lloyds announce branch closure to leave Hatfield with one bank
While awaiting the judgement chair of the council’s planning committee, councillor Stephen Boulton said: “It’s vital incidents like this are challenged to the full extent of the legal process, it’s not acceptable that people can set out to deceive the council.
“The vast majority of people do go through the proper planning procedures and, because this is the case, we have a duty to pursue those who deliberately ignore the planning regulations.”