Man fighting Welwyn Hatfield Council appears at Supreme Court
A MAN fighting to stay living in a �500,000 barn built on the Green Belt appeared at the highest court in the country to face Welwyn Hatfield Council.
Alan Beesley watched from the public gallery of the Supreme Court, as his legal team fought his case.
As reported in last week’s WHT the 40-year-old had applied for a certificate to lawfully stay in his barn, inside of which was a luxury family home, not the hay barn he had planning permission for.
The law states a homeowner can apply to stay in a dwelling if they have lived in it for more than four years.
He admitted deceiving Welwyn Hatfield Council, but his lawyer Alexander Booth asked the seven law lords to “maintain perspective”.
You may also want to watch:
Mr Beesley had previously told the WHT he thought the council had a “bee in their bonnet” about his case and was surprised it had taken the action it had.
The seven law lords adjourned the case and will provide a written judgement in due course.
- 1 Keep on the grass - sign telling people to stay off land taped over
- 2 June 21: Will Step 4 lifting of coronavirus restrictions be delayed until July?
- 3 The latest court results for Welwyn Hatfield and Potters Bar
- 4 Welwyn Garden City Hockey Club pushing for more girls to play in centenary season
- 5 Save Symondshyde still waiting for inspector's report
- 6 Woody & Kleiny release Euros single Route 66 with The Hoosiers for charity CALM
- 7 Welwyn continue meteoric rise up the table as Owais Shah takes centre stage again
- 8 Heroic dogs win Royal Veterinary College award
- 9 'This doesn’t make much sense' - MPs react to proposed boundary changes
- 10 Pupils present check from Captain Tom 100 Challenge to charity
While awaiting the judgement chair of the council’s planning committee, councillor Stephen Boulton said: “It’s vital incidents like this are challenged to the full extent of the legal process, it’s not acceptable that people can set out to deceive the council.
“The vast majority of people do go through the proper planning procedures and, because this is the case, we have a duty to pursue those who deliberately ignore the planning regulations.”