Find, save and share Public Notices that affect you in the area.
Search the Public Notice Portal What is the Public Notice Portal?What is the Public Notice Portal?
The Public Notice Portal carries statutory public notices published in local newspapers and is the fastest and most effective way of finding out what is happening in YOUR neighbourhood.
Search the Public Notice PortalPlanning permission for a 900-home development on the southern edge of Potters Bar has been rejected.
The decision was made at a Hertsmere Borough Council planning committee meeting last night, December 1, which saw the application regarding land west of Barnet Road and east of Baker Street rigorously scrutinised.
The committee voted on Cllr Glenn Brisky's proposal to refuse the application "on the grounds that this would be inappropriate development in the green belt".
Nine members voted for refusal, three voted against, and one abstained.
Submitted by Bloor Homes and Griggs Homes, the plans also included space for shops, a two-form entry primary school, a care home, a community centre, children’s play areas and sports pitches, including three football pitches and a cricket pitch.
In the application, planning officers argued the green belt land in question should actually be considered grey belt, and even if councillors believe it does not count as grey belt, they would recommend approval on the basis that the benefits of the scheme “clearly outweigh” the harms.
Read more
- Teacher banned over allegations of downloading and possessing indecent images of kids
- Work resumes on building Marks & Spencer Foodhall in Hatfield retail park
Officers accepted that the application would harm the landscape, but believed the harm would be outweighed by delivering new housing, improving biodiversity, and providing a care home, shops and open space.
Members rejected these claims, deciding the land should not in fact be considered grey belt.
They also argued the reduction in the amount of agricultural land in the area, and the fact the site failed a flood test, would far outweigh any benefits.
The proximity to the motorway proved to be another point of concern, with some parts of the development sitting just 50 metres from the M25's carriageway.
More than 2,300 residents wrote to the council to object to the scheme, complaining about the loss of green belt land and increased congestion on nearby roads.
In light of the vote to reject planning permission, Cllr Chris Myers said "this is a battle won, not the end of the war", and suggested it is likely the developers appeal the refusal.
"For now, though," his post continued, "the community has been heard and the application has been refused."
To view the full meeting, visit www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuDlbCqKaRY
Share